<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coding without comments and the &#8216;Single Use&#8217; Principle</title>
	<link>http://jm.monkk.com/2008/07/27/coding-without-comments-and-the-single-use-principle/</link>
	<description>Who knows what a programmer thinks?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: BlueRaja</title>
		<link>http://jm.monkk.com/2008/07/27/coding-without-comments-and-the-single-use-principle/#comment-332</link>
		<author>BlueRaja</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jm.monkk.com/2008/07/27/coding-without-comments-and-the-single-use-principle/#comment-332</guid>
		<description>My thoughts exactly.  Even more annoying is that many Agile-programming proponents state that since a class should have a single purpose, it should have only one method as well, which I believe is taking the idea *way* too far.  Imagine trying to piece together not dozens of tiny methods, but dozens of tiny classes, each in their own separate file!  It's enough to destroy the willpower of even the most disciplined programmers..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts exactly.  Even more annoying is that many Agile-programming proponents state that since a class should have a single purpose, it should have only one method as well, which I believe is taking the idea *way* too far.  Imagine trying to piece together not dozens of tiny methods, but dozens of tiny classes, each in their own separate file!  It&#8217;s enough to destroy the willpower of even the most disciplined programmers..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
